Blog #14

Results, Discussion, and Conclusion were three very helpful sites. They instruct very well on each of the topics and talk about things that i have ever been required to do.

Results

  • Purpose-Presents the results and makes them meaningful.
  • What it includes-Statement of Results and Explanatory Text
  • Common Problem- text includes too much detail and often repeats
  • Organization- Results then discussion or Part of results then discussion, another part of results then discussion.
  • Example Advice-Gives an example and asks you to identify the task.

Discussion

  • Function- interpret results in light of what is already known about investigation.
  • Style- active voice, no wordy sentences, be concise, and use first person in moderation.
  • Approach- organize the discussion to address each of the experiments or studies for which you presented results.

Conclusion

  • About Conclusions- its the frame and acts as a bridge. Where you have your final saying about your paper and to demonstrate the importance of the paper. Should make readers glad that they read it.
  • Strategies for writing an effective conclusion- Play the “so what” game. (Question why you wrote it, why it is important.) Keep theme of the intro, synthesize, propose a solution, and point to broader implications.

Results- http://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/writing/HTWsections.html#results

This site on results wasn’t as informative as the other results site, but it still helps.

  • Function-objectively present the key results without interpretation, in a logical order.
  • Style- use the active voice as much as possible, use the past tense, avoid repetative paragraph structures, no interpreation

Disscussion- http://www.udmercy.edu/crna/agm/htresult.htm

  • Presentation- no repetition, what’s new, different, important about results. No bias.
  • Components of Disscussion Section- Look back: do they make sense about what you have already stated? Look forward: suggestion for future research .

Conclussion- http://www.tailoredessays.com/how-write/research-paper/introduction-conclusion.htm

  • Most important part of the paper. Restate thesis and show that the material adds up. manifests value of research and your understanding of the material. Should be strong recapitulation of your major ideas.

Blog #13

In having all 3 parts put together so far, it definitly brings my paper more to life for me. It is a more cohesive experience for my reader. The major changes that i had to make were re-doing my lit review. It sounded too much like an introduction, so i combined the two. I still have a lot of work to do. I still need a lot of sources, transition sentences, and information. I am working on it, just a little rough right now.

Blog #12

Begin thinking about your research methods;  Participants – Who will your research subjects be? My research subjects will most likely be college students that attend IUP. I might also find subjects that range in age. For example, if i  would consult my grandma, it will give those who are reading my paper more of an idea of the evolution of vampires. My grandma may look at them differently since she is much older. She may have different oppinions.

 How will you find them? I  was planning on doing some surveys and interview. I have some friends that have volunteered themselves to conduct some interviews with me. Maybe i also would be able to pass a survey around class.

How many will you need? I am not sure on the number that i would need, but i would probably need between 10-20 participants.

Are there any potential dangers to your participants in undertaking this research? No. There will just be a survey will open ended questions and a few closed ended questions. There are no dangers, unless someone is so scared of vampires that they dont even want to talk about it. But i don’t think i will run into that problem.

How will you protect your participants from harm and safeguard their privacy? I won’t require there names. It will be completely anonymous. Although i may ask for their age. Also the surveys will be completely optional.

 What questions do you have about methods and data collection at this time and how will you answer them? As of right now i am not sure. I am just a little unsure as to when whe should start collecting data.

Blog #11

In the article, Method and Research Design, it was very helpful in giving you advice on how to construct your paper through method and design.  

Purpose in the method section addresses two specific questions:  

  • How was the data collected or generated? 
  •  How was it analyzed?

Answering these questions show the reader how you got your results. This is very helpful because we have to perform either qualitative or quantitative research so this is starting to prepare us for this step. At the bottom of this section it has many helpful tips while writing this.

Common Problems

  • Irrelevant Detail- Explains that those who are reading the paper are of similar education, so you may not have to go into detail about certain facts or procedures.
  • Unnecessary explanation of basic procedures-Explains that those who are reading the paper are of similar education, so you may not have to go into detail about certain facts or procedures.
  • Problem Blindness- Do not ignore certain problems that you may find. Although you may not want to use them, they are still relevant.

Overview

  • Introduction-introduction of research problem introduction of objectives introduction of how objectives will be achieved
  • Literature Review-review of previous work relating to research problem (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to methodology (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to results (particularly reliability, etc.)
  • Method-explanation of how data was collected/generated · explanation of how data was analyzed explanation of methodological problems and their solutions or effects
  • Results and Disscussion-presentation of results interpretation of results discussion of results
  • Conclusions-has the research problem been “solved”? to what extent have the objectives been achieved? what has been learnt from the results? how can this knowledge be used? what are the shortcomings of the research, or the research methodology? etc.

Examples of Different Types of Research

  • Analysis-classes of data are collected and studies conducted to discern patterns and formulate principles that might guide future action
  • Case Study-the background, development, current conditions and environmental interactions of one or more individuals, groups, communities, businesses or institutions is observed, recorded and analyzed for stages of patterns in relation to internal and external influences.
  • Comparison- two or more existing situations are studied to determine their similarities and differences.
  • Correlation-Prediction-statistically significant correlation coefficients between and among a number of factors are sought and interpreted.
  • Evaluation-research to determine whether a program or project followed the prescribed procedures and achieved the stated outcomes.
  • Design-Demonstration-new systems or programs are constructed, tested and evaluated
  • Survey-Questionnaire-behaviors, beliefs and observations of specific groups are identified, reported and interpreted.
  • Status-representative or selected sample of one or more phenomena is examined to determine its special characteristics.
  • Theory Construction-an attempt to find or describe principles that explain how things work the way they do.
  • Trend Analysis-predicting or forecasting the future direction of events

Method Section: An Example- Gives a great example of a Method Section

Writing Your Own Method Section- Gives some helpful tips on how to write your own Method Section.

http://psychology.about.com/b/2006/11/13/how-to-write-a-method-section.htm

Although this site is for writing a method section in a psychology paper, the basic idea is still here. Basically it says to provide detailed information about the research design, participants, equipment, materials, variables, and actions taken by the participants. You should provide enough information, so that someone could perform your research methods on their own just by reading your paper.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blog #10

A ruberic is something that helps you score or evaluate an item of work. Most of us have been graded with these after writing a research paper. These components must apply:

Organization

  1. The information seems to be disorganized.
  2. Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed.
  3. Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs
  4. Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings.

Amount of Information

  1. One or more topics were not addressed.
  2. All topics are addressed, and most questions answered with  1 sentence about each.
  3. All topics are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.
  4. All topics are addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.

Quality of Information

  1. Information  has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
  2. Information clearly addresses the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.
  3. Information clearly addresses the main topic. It  provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples
  4. Information clearly addresses the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples

Mechanics

  1. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
  2. A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.
  3. Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
  4. No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

Sources

  1. Some sources are not accurately cited.
  2. All sources  are accurately cited, but many are not in the desired format.
  3. All sources  are accurately cited, but a few are not in the desired format.
  4. All sources  are accurately cited in the desired format.

Book Test #1

1) Provide 2 examples where you feel your author clearly used research methods to gather info about the topic being written about. Please provide quotes from the novel for each example and THOROUGHLY explain why you chose that quote and why you feel the novelist was also a researcher.

             Throughout the book, Jon Krakauer proves that he did much research. Since Chris was somewhat a nomad, he met a lot of people. People that Krakauer had to track down and interview. Most of the interviews are on a face to face basis, so Krakauer traveled a lot throughout his research as well. A great example of this would be when he visited Alaska himself. The same place on the Stampede Trail where Chris spent the last months of his life, “A year and a week after Chris McCandless decided not to attempt to cross the Teklanika River, I stand on the opposite bank—the eastern side, the highway side—and gaze into the churning water. I, too, hope to cross the river. I want to visit the bus. I want to see where McCandless died, to better understand why” (Krakauer, p173). I chose this quote because it’s a great example of the amount of research that he did. When many people are writing, they often don’t go visit the site where the event occurred, etc. They rely on others accounts and go off of that.

            Krakauer also went door to door in search of Chris’ friends and family. Throughout the book, it jumps from one account of McCandless to another, and Krakauer is often very descriptive about these interviews. For example, “Two framed photographs occupy the mantel in Carine McCandless’s Virginia Beach home: one of Chris as a junior in high school, the other of Chris as a seven-year-old in a pint size suit and crooked tie, standing beside Carine, who is wearing a frilly dress and a new Easter hat” (Krakauer,p127). Krakauer doesn’t just go to hear the story but researches the people themselves and observes how strong the ties were between Chris and themselves. The author also borrows many of Chris’ books that he often commented in and has them in random order throughout the novel. I think that Krakauer is a great researcher because he actually cared enough to go out and see for himself.

2) How does the author hook in the reader at the beginning of the novel? Please provide 2 quotes from the novel and THOROUGHLY explain why you chose those quotes and why you feel the novelist did what he/she did.

I think there are two specific ways in which the author hooked in the reader at the begging of the novel. The first one doesn’t lay directly in the story, but in the Author’s Note before the story actually begins, “In April 1992, a young man from a well-to-do East Coast family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness north of Mt. KcKinley. Four months later his decomposed body was found by a party of moose hunters” (Krakauer, Author’s Note). In my opinion, this would hook in the reader because they automatically see the mystery in the story. Although, no one may know what exactly what was going through Chris McCandless’s mind, this novel gives us an idea.

The next hook actually lies in the story. It actually starts in each chapter. At the beginning of each chapter,Krakauer starts off with a passage from a book, either from Chris’ own hand, or from a book that he was reading during his travels. In the first chapter, The Alaska Interior, Krakauer gives us Chris last post card to Wayne Westerberg, “April 27th 1992- Greetings from Fairbanks! this is the last you shall hear from me Wayne. Arrived here 2 days ago. It was very difficult to catch rides in the Yukon Territory. But i finally got here. Please return all mail i recieve to the sender. It might be a very long time before i return South. If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t ever hear from me again I want you to know you’re a great man. I now walk into the wild. Alex” (Krakauer,p3). This passage is one of the final written documents that Chris sent to anyone. It draws in the reader, because they can see the persons own words and they can also see that he was aware of the consequences. Like i said before, i think it outlines the mystery and makes the reader eager to learn more.

Krakauer chose to use these quotes and passages of Chris’ because it brings in the reader. It brings them into the mind of Chris McCandless. Many books don’t ever have anything written by the person, so Krakauer definilty used this to his advantage.

4) What is the connection between the introduction and conclusion of the novel? How does/doesn’t the author form a circle between intro and conclusion? More specifically, what have you learned about storytelling from this author considering the Zinsser article you read about “the lead and the ending” and the Faryna article “Finding identity and voice?”

Once again, the similarities between the introduction and the conclusion are the passages from Chris. In the beginning, it starts off with his last post card that he sent. In the conclusion, it ends with the last entry that Chris McCandless ever wrote, “I have had a happy life and thank the Lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!” (Krakauer,p199). The circle is obiviously the writtings of Chris McCandless. Also in the Epilogue, it ends with setting the scene. It seems that Krakauer sets the scene in the beginning directly after the passage from Chris while he is interviewing Chris’ friend Wayne, and also in the end when he describes the scenery, and the sound of his parents leaving the bus.

I have learned a lot from this author. He used such in depth research methods, and it took a lot of time to accomplish. Jon Krakauer definilty had his own voice in this because i have never read anything like it. Having personal entries from the person gives the book a lot of character. He also didn’t put everything into sequence. He learned a lot of his information in pieces, so he did the same for the reader. You must piece it together yourself. At the end, and at the beggining, Krakauer also wrote about the same time period. It was his last postcard or entry. They both showed that Chris was accepting of his situation, and ready for anything.

Works Cited

1.) Krakauer, Jon. Into the Wild. New York: Anchor Books, 1996. Print.

Blog #9

The Introductory Paragraph was a very helpful source in creating an introduction. It stresses first impressions. Just like a first impression of a person, a first impression of a paper holds the same amount of gravity. Next your essay should start with an interesting sentence, or a hook. This should then lead into a few sentences that states what your paper is about. To be informative and correct is the thesis, which the whole paper is based upon. Certain ideas to be considered while writing your opening sentence,

  • Surprising Fact
  • Humor
  • Quotation

When trying to find your hook, keep these things in mind,

  • Curiosity-Interesting fact
  • Definition- Definition of main focus of paper
  • Anecdote-Story

This site also reminds writers that after the paper is completed, go back and recheck the introductory paragraph and the thesis statement to make sure it still is true.

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/intros.htm

This webpage is very helpful in instructing someone on how to write and introductory paragraph. First of all, it lists things not to do when writing an introduction,

  • Apologize
  • Announce your intention
  • Use dictionary or encylapedia definition
  • Dilly Dally- not getting to your point.

Next, Harry Livermore (who wrote this), stresses that there are two things that you should address in an introductory paragraph. First come up with a good thesis, since that is what your paper is based upon, and second writing a good hook. He says that this is the hardest part. Things to consider when writing a introductory paragraph,

  • Historical Review
  • Anecdotal
  • Surprising Statement
  • Famous Person
  • Declarative-Stating what the paper is going to be about.

This site was very helpful also because it gives a list of paths to go and gives an explanation of them very thoroughly and also includes examples.

These websites were very helpful in writing an introduction. I think that the thesis is extremely important but no one will ever get there if you don’t reel them in first. So in saying this, i think the most important part is the opening sentence. In my paper, i think i might try to include an interesting fact, a story, or even just set the scene. I’m not sure what ill use yet but i hope that i can draw the readers in.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.