Course Assistant Introduction

Hi everyone,

I’m Casey and will be one of your course assistants in English 202 this semester. I am a junior here and just got done taking Marlens class. It was a lot of hardwork, but with some dedication and focus, you will make it through as well. I am hoping to gain a lot from this experience by being able to help all of you with this class. Hopefully i can help you through it by talking about your work and answering any questions you may have. I will be in some of your classes and meeting with you throughout the semester. Also,feel free to email me at any time. I look forward to meeting all of you. Good Luck!

Blog #17

BLOG #17: I warned you, right? This was pretty intense and unbelievably time-consuming, right? Reflect back on the beginning of this course – your fears, anxieties, worries, etc – and discuss how you turned these into strengths throughout this course this semester.First off, i thought that Marlen was bluffing about how much work we had. I thought he was just trying to scare us, but he was being honest. Towards the beginning i had a lot of fears, anxiety, worries, and all the etc. I thought i wasn’t a strong writer and that this was too much work than i could handle with my other classes. I would be at the library every night for hours on end and feel like i got nothing accomplished. After i got into the swing of things and actually found out how to create/work a blog, i developed time management and some organization. In my opinon, these are two things that make or break you in a research writing class, and i feel like i handled them fairly well. I think that this class allowed me to develop them further, which is very beneficial for future classes and a career.

What are your future goals as researchers? Since i am a History major, most of my work is research. Basically i will graduate with a degree in researching history. So hopefully i can get a job that relates to my major, and here i will definitly use these skills. I think i have learned more about research in this class than in any other class here at IUP or anywhere.As writers? I have always enjoyed creative writing. I used to do some when i was younger, but havn’t in a while. After taking this class i feel more confident in my writing, because even creative pieces can use research. Maybe some day i will write a book or something and this class definitly put me one step closer to that.

 What was your proudest moment in this course? My proudest moment…hmmm…i think now is my proudest moment. Although we are not completely finished yet, i have survived this class. At times it was hard to imagine this happening, but i have. Surviving other classes is one thing, but surviving this class is a different ball game. I feel like i accomplished something in this class. Maybe not a published paper, but i feel like i gained a lot from taking this class.

What do you think will most stick with you long after this course? I think that the concept of research will stick with me because it was drilled into our heads every second, but because it made me feel like a great writer and just a well rounded student in general. I read for pleasure, but now i catch my self analyzing the authors research. I sit there thinking, wow this author had to go here or there, or conduct interview, or read up on a lot of the history/customs, etc. I think this makes me appreciate their work so much more.

Blog #16

  • BLOG # 16: Reflect on the process of creating your research paper and answer the following questions. You will later expand on these in your portfolio cover letter:
  • 1) What assignment/document was most useful to you during this proces? Explain your answer.  A document that really helped me was Anne Lamotte’s Shitty First Drafts. I had anxiety about writing a draft, because i felt like it had to be well written for the first draft. It was very relieving to learn that we used this moto. Something Lamotte said that helped me ease the anxiety was, “I know some very great, writers you love who write beautifully and have amde a great deal of money, and not one of them sits down routinely feeling wildly enthusiastic and confident. Not one of them writes elegant first drafts.”

    2) What was the most helpful feedback you received at any stage – why was it helpful? I think the most useful feedback was from when we did our peer review projects. Friends can help in editing your drafts, but it’s nice to have a set of new eyes from someone that you don’t know all that well. They are usually fairly honest with you and often times give really useful feedback because they have a different style of writing. Also because it’s the first time that they have ever read your work so they are not accostumed to your writing style. This allows for helpful feedback.

     3) What was most difficult for you during the drafting process? Easiest? WHY? The hardest part for me was the first draft because it is the first piece of writing that i did for my entire research paper. It is the framework for your actual paper. It was also difficult to do the 2nd draft because my 1st draft mainly comprised of my ideas all written down breifly in a jumbled form. So the second draft was difficult, because of trying to lace them all together. The easiest part i think was my third draft because i then had a better feel as to what i wanted to write about and how to put all of my work together (for the most part).

    4) Where does your final essay best show your ability as a writer? I think i show my best ability in my literature review. It still needs a lot of work, but i feel that i got what i wanted to say out in this section. I really liked it because i have never done one before, although it had a rocky beginning. It was interesting how we had to touch on anything that related to our papers and then later we could weave them all together. I feel that this is one of my strongest part, but my paper still needs a lot of work.

     

     

    Blog #15

    BLOG ENTRY #15: What did you learn from your peer review projects about: The peer review projects were very helpful because we get a lot of feedback on our paper. It’s nice to have new eyes looking at your paper because it often gives you a different take on your paper instead of having the same people read it. They can only offer so much and may only see certain things that other people might miss.1) Writing and Editing in general: i have learned that people write in different ways and in ways that i would never think to do. everyone has their own style. Also that editing wasn’t absolute because i’m not an editor, i’m a college student so my editing skills were limited.  2) your actual research project, specifically: i thought my paper was horrible (which i still do at this point), but my peer reviewers liked it and think that it has a lot of potential. Also i need more sources!

    Blog #14

    Results, Discussion, and Conclusion were three very helpful sites. They instruct very well on each of the topics and talk about things that i have ever been required to do.

    Results

    • Purpose-Presents the results and makes them meaningful.
    • What it includes-Statement of Results and Explanatory Text
    • Common Problem- text includes too much detail and often repeats
    • Organization- Results then discussion or Part of results then discussion, another part of results then discussion.
    • Example Advice-Gives an example and asks you to identify the task.

    Discussion

    • Function- interpret results in light of what is already known about investigation.
    • Style- active voice, no wordy sentences, be concise, and use first person in moderation.
    • Approach- organize the discussion to address each of the experiments or studies for which you presented results.

    Conclusion

    • About Conclusions- its the frame and acts as a bridge. Where you have your final saying about your paper and to demonstrate the importance of the paper. Should make readers glad that they read it.
    • Strategies for writing an effective conclusion- Play the “so what” game. (Question why you wrote it, why it is important.) Keep theme of the intro, synthesize, propose a solution, and point to broader implications.

    Results- http://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/writing/HTWsections.html#results

    This site on results wasn’t as informative as the other results site, but it still helps.

    • Function-objectively present the key results without interpretation, in a logical order.
    • Style- use the active voice as much as possible, use the past tense, avoid repetative paragraph structures, no interpreation

    Disscussion- http://www.udmercy.edu/crna/agm/htresult.htm

    • Presentation- no repetition, what’s new, different, important about results. No bias.
    • Components of Disscussion Section- Look back: do they make sense about what you have already stated? Look forward: suggestion for future research .

    Conclussion- http://www.tailoredessays.com/how-write/research-paper/introduction-conclusion.htm

    • Most important part of the paper. Restate thesis and show that the material adds up. manifests value of research and your understanding of the material. Should be strong recapitulation of your major ideas.

    Blog #13

    In having all 3 parts put together so far, it definitly brings my paper more to life for me. It is a more cohesive experience for my reader. The major changes that i had to make were re-doing my lit review. It sounded too much like an introduction, so i combined the two. I still have a lot of work to do. I still need a lot of sources, transition sentences, and information. I am working on it, just a little rough right now.

    Blog #12

    Begin thinking about your research methods;  Participants – Who will your research subjects be? My research subjects will most likely be college students that attend IUP. I might also find subjects that range in age. For example, if i  would consult my grandma, it will give those who are reading my paper more of an idea of the evolution of vampires. My grandma may look at them differently since she is much older. She may have different oppinions.

     How will you find them? I  was planning on doing some surveys and interview. I have some friends that have volunteered themselves to conduct some interviews with me. Maybe i also would be able to pass a survey around class.

    How many will you need? I am not sure on the number that i would need, but i would probably need between 10-20 participants.

    Are there any potential dangers to your participants in undertaking this research? No. There will just be a survey will open ended questions and a few closed ended questions. There are no dangers, unless someone is so scared of vampires that they dont even want to talk about it. But i don’t think i will run into that problem.

    How will you protect your participants from harm and safeguard their privacy? I won’t require there names. It will be completely anonymous. Although i may ask for their age. Also the surveys will be completely optional.

     What questions do you have about methods and data collection at this time and how will you answer them? As of right now i am not sure. I am just a little unsure as to when whe should start collecting data.

    Blog #11

    In the article, Method and Research Design, it was very helpful in giving you advice on how to construct your paper through method and design.  

    Purpose in the method section addresses two specific questions:  

    • How was the data collected or generated? 
    •  How was it analyzed?

    Answering these questions show the reader how you got your results. This is very helpful because we have to perform either qualitative or quantitative research so this is starting to prepare us for this step. At the bottom of this section it has many helpful tips while writing this.

    Common Problems

    • Irrelevant Detail- Explains that those who are reading the paper are of similar education, so you may not have to go into detail about certain facts or procedures.
    • Unnecessary explanation of basic procedures-Explains that those who are reading the paper are of similar education, so you may not have to go into detail about certain facts or procedures.
    • Problem Blindness- Do not ignore certain problems that you may find. Although you may not want to use them, they are still relevant.

    Overview

    • Introduction-introduction of research problem introduction of objectives introduction of how objectives will be achieved
    • Literature Review-review of previous work relating to research problem (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to methodology (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to results (particularly reliability, etc.)
    • Method-explanation of how data was collected/generated · explanation of how data was analyzed explanation of methodological problems and their solutions or effects
    • Results and Disscussion-presentation of results interpretation of results discussion of results
    • Conclusions-has the research problem been “solved”? to what extent have the objectives been achieved? what has been learnt from the results? how can this knowledge be used? what are the shortcomings of the research, or the research methodology? etc.

    Examples of Different Types of Research

    • Analysis-classes of data are collected and studies conducted to discern patterns and formulate principles that might guide future action
    • Case Study-the background, development, current conditions and environmental interactions of one or more individuals, groups, communities, businesses or institutions is observed, recorded and analyzed for stages of patterns in relation to internal and external influences.
    • Comparison- two or more existing situations are studied to determine their similarities and differences.
    • Correlation-Prediction-statistically significant correlation coefficients between and among a number of factors are sought and interpreted.
    • Evaluation-research to determine whether a program or project followed the prescribed procedures and achieved the stated outcomes.
    • Design-Demonstration-new systems or programs are constructed, tested and evaluated
    • Survey-Questionnaire-behaviors, beliefs and observations of specific groups are identified, reported and interpreted.
    • Status-representative or selected sample of one or more phenomena is examined to determine its special characteristics.
    • Theory Construction-an attempt to find or describe principles that explain how things work the way they do.
    • Trend Analysis-predicting or forecasting the future direction of events

    Method Section: An Example- Gives a great example of a Method Section

    Writing Your Own Method Section- Gives some helpful tips on how to write your own Method Section.

    http://psychology.about.com/b/2006/11/13/how-to-write-a-method-section.htm

    Although this site is for writing a method section in a psychology paper, the basic idea is still here. Basically it says to provide detailed information about the research design, participants, equipment, materials, variables, and actions taken by the participants. You should provide enough information, so that someone could perform your research methods on their own just by reading your paper.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Blog #10

    A ruberic is something that helps you score or evaluate an item of work. Most of us have been graded with these after writing a research paper. These components must apply:

    Organization

    1. The information seems to be disorganized.
    2. Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed.
    3. Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs
    4. Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings.

    Amount of Information

    1. One or more topics were not addressed.
    2. All topics are addressed, and most questions answered with  1 sentence about each.
    3. All topics are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.
    4. All topics are addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each.

    Quality of Information

    1. Information  has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
    2. Information clearly addresses the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.
    3. Information clearly addresses the main topic. It  provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples
    4. Information clearly addresses the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples

    Mechanics

    1. Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
    2. A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.
    3. Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
    4. No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

    Sources

    1. Some sources are not accurately cited.
    2. All sources  are accurately cited, but many are not in the desired format.
    3. All sources  are accurately cited, but a few are not in the desired format.
    4. All sources  are accurately cited in the desired format.

    Book Test #1

    1) Provide 2 examples where you feel your author clearly used research methods to gather info about the topic being written about. Please provide quotes from the novel for each example and THOROUGHLY explain why you chose that quote and why you feel the novelist was also a researcher.

                 Throughout the book, Jon Krakauer proves that he did much research. Since Chris was somewhat a nomad, he met a lot of people. People that Krakauer had to track down and interview. Most of the interviews are on a face to face basis, so Krakauer traveled a lot throughout his research as well. A great example of this would be when he visited Alaska himself. The same place on the Stampede Trail where Chris spent the last months of his life, “A year and a week after Chris McCandless decided not to attempt to cross the Teklanika River, I stand on the opposite bank—the eastern side, the highway side—and gaze into the churning water. I, too, hope to cross the river. I want to visit the bus. I want to see where McCandless died, to better understand why” (Krakauer, p173). I chose this quote because it’s a great example of the amount of research that he did. When many people are writing, they often don’t go visit the site where the event occurred, etc. They rely on others accounts and go off of that.

                Krakauer also went door to door in search of Chris’ friends and family. Throughout the book, it jumps from one account of McCandless to another, and Krakauer is often very descriptive about these interviews. For example, “Two framed photographs occupy the mantel in Carine McCandless’s Virginia Beach home: one of Chris as a junior in high school, the other of Chris as a seven-year-old in a pint size suit and crooked tie, standing beside Carine, who is wearing a frilly dress and a new Easter hat” (Krakauer,p127). Krakauer doesn’t just go to hear the story but researches the people themselves and observes how strong the ties were between Chris and themselves. The author also borrows many of Chris’ books that he often commented in and has them in random order throughout the novel. I think that Krakauer is a great researcher because he actually cared enough to go out and see for himself.

    2) How does the author hook in the reader at the beginning of the novel? Please provide 2 quotes from the novel and THOROUGHLY explain why you chose those quotes and why you feel the novelist did what he/she did.

    I think there are two specific ways in which the author hooked in the reader at the begging of the novel. The first one doesn’t lay directly in the story, but in the Author’s Note before the story actually begins, “In April 1992, a young man from a well-to-do East Coast family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness north of Mt. KcKinley. Four months later his decomposed body was found by a party of moose hunters” (Krakauer, Author’s Note). In my opinion, this would hook in the reader because they automatically see the mystery in the story. Although, no one may know what exactly what was going through Chris McCandless’s mind, this novel gives us an idea.

    The next hook actually lies in the story. It actually starts in each chapter. At the beginning of each chapter,Krakauer starts off with a passage from a book, either from Chris’ own hand, or from a book that he was reading during his travels. In the first chapter, The Alaska Interior, Krakauer gives us Chris last post card to Wayne Westerberg, “April 27th 1992- Greetings from Fairbanks! this is the last you shall hear from me Wayne. Arrived here 2 days ago. It was very difficult to catch rides in the Yukon Territory. But i finally got here. Please return all mail i recieve to the sender. It might be a very long time before i return South. If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t ever hear from me again I want you to know you’re a great man. I now walk into the wild. Alex” (Krakauer,p3). This passage is one of the final written documents that Chris sent to anyone. It draws in the reader, because they can see the persons own words and they can also see that he was aware of the consequences. Like i said before, i think it outlines the mystery and makes the reader eager to learn more.

    Krakauer chose to use these quotes and passages of Chris’ because it brings in the reader. It brings them into the mind of Chris McCandless. Many books don’t ever have anything written by the person, so Krakauer definilty used this to his advantage.

    4) What is the connection between the introduction and conclusion of the novel? How does/doesn’t the author form a circle between intro and conclusion? More specifically, what have you learned about storytelling from this author considering the Zinsser article you read about “the lead and the ending” and the Faryna article “Finding identity and voice?”

    Once again, the similarities between the introduction and the conclusion are the passages from Chris. In the beginning, it starts off with his last post card that he sent. In the conclusion, it ends with the last entry that Chris McCandless ever wrote, “I have had a happy life and thank the Lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!” (Krakauer,p199). The circle is obiviously the writtings of Chris McCandless. Also in the Epilogue, it ends with setting the scene. It seems that Krakauer sets the scene in the beginning directly after the passage from Chris while he is interviewing Chris’ friend Wayne, and also in the end when he describes the scenery, and the sound of his parents leaving the bus.

    I have learned a lot from this author. He used such in depth research methods, and it took a lot of time to accomplish. Jon Krakauer definilty had his own voice in this because i have never read anything like it. Having personal entries from the person gives the book a lot of character. He also didn’t put everything into sequence. He learned a lot of his information in pieces, so he did the same for the reader. You must piece it together yourself. At the end, and at the beggining, Krakauer also wrote about the same time period. It was his last postcard or entry. They both showed that Chris was accepting of his situation, and ready for anything.

    Works Cited

    1.) Krakauer, Jon. Into the Wild. New York: Anchor Books, 1996. Print.

    « Older entries

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.